The Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research

Ethnic group: identity and change 1991-2001

Funders: ESRC (as part of a Fellowship)
Name: Ludi Simpson
Dates: October 2003-September 2004

Outputs

The results quantify the unreliability of ethnic group recording over time due to question change, amibiguity of the question for some respondents (including those not born in the country or region associated with the ethnic group label), errors, and conscious change of affiliation.

The analysis provides recommendations for analysts of individual microdata and aggregate data. The classification which best fits both the 1991 and 2001 Census categories are the seven categories (with an eighth residual category) is given opposite. It has been adopted in ONS guidance on comparing 1991 and 2001 Census ethnic group data.

Presentation group

1991 categories

2001 categories

Degree of fit

(% of those in this group in 1991, keeping same group in 2001)

White

White

White Briton

Irish

Other White

99.5

Indian

Indian

Indian

91.0

Pakistani

Pakistani

Pakistani

91.9

Bangladeshi

Bangladeshi

Bangladeshi

93.4

Caribbean

Caribbean

Caribbean

77.2

African

African

African

77.4

Chinese

Chinese

Chinese

91.0

Other

Other Black

Other Asian

Other

Caribbean / White

African / White

Asian / White

Other Mixed

Other Black

Other Asian

Other

62.8

The final category 'Other' is not intended for comparison between the two years: it is made up of a different mix of categories in each year.

This was one of the ONS Longitudinal Study's beta test projects, designed to check and validate the data for individuals linked across censuses up to and including 2001. Project proposal.

Reports to LS (reports 3 and 4 in particular contain material not published elsewhere):

1 Concepts

2 Group amalgamation

3 Imputation Sex, Country of Birth, Ethnic group

4 Small cells - impact of suppression on analysis

University of Manchester CCSR