Visual methods
Bookings for the conference have now closed. Back to the Programme.
details
Session
Programme
Chair:
Roger Goodman, University of Oxford
| 2.00-3.30 |
Conceptual issues associated with visual methods:
why do we need visual methods? How do they relate to traditional ethnography?
How are data analysed? |
| |
Visual methods
in the context of multimodality
Bella Dicks, University
of Cardiff
This session will examine
how visual and multimedia data employ particular semiotic ‘modes’,
and as a result afford distinctive kinds of meaning. I will be talking
both about data in the field and about data in field
records . I will discuss how visual data in the field can be
related to data employing other modes; e.g. sound, writing, speech,
texture, and so forth. All field data have to be recorded
for research purposes using dedicated recording media and this in
turn has implications for multimodality. Still images, for example,
communicate in different ways to moving images, and both are distinct
from recorded sound.
Today’s researchers increasingly
want to utilise such different media in conjunction with each other,
not least because the technologies for doing so are now readily available
and affordable. Yet it is not always easy or straightforward to exploit
data successfully in different media forms. We will think about how
as researchers we can succeed in combining different media on the
computer screen, both for analysis and for representational purposes,
in a way that can make best use of the various modes they employ. |
| |
Using visual methods
to understand other people's experience
Sarah Pink, University
of Loughborough
This presentation will concentrate on the
use of visual research methods in understanding and communicating
about other people's multi-sensory embodied experiences. I will suggest
that by combining visual and other methods of research and representation
we can create a blend of theoretical and experiential text that communicates
about other people's realities more effectively than printed or filmic
texts might. |
| |
|
| 3.30-4.00 |
Coffee/tea |
| |
|
| 4.00-5.30 |
Social life under
the microscope
Monika Buscher, University
of Lancaster |
| |
Video Analysis, Remote
Collaboration and e-Social Science: The development of MiMeG
Jon Hindmarsh and Mike
Fraser
One of the benefits of video-based
research in the social sciences is that it can provide unprecedented
opportunities to share, discuss and collaboratively analyse raw qualitative
data with colleagues. Indeed there are numerous joint projects emerging
across the UK , Europe and beyond that are utilising these distinct
affordances of video data. One of the ways in which these materials
are analysed is through group data analysis sessions (or ‘data sessions’)
and the practicalities of working in national and international projects
has lead to calls for technological solutions to support distributed
data sessions – data sessions involving groups of remote participants.
Existing software, tools and technologies are limited in this regard.
However this presentation will outline efforts as part of the ESRC’s
e-Social Science programme to develop innovative solutions to some
of the problems of remote working with video data. It will outline
our progress through a programme of work that encompasses the collection
of requirements for new technologies, to the development of demonstrator
technologies and the trial of these technologies with social scientists
working with video materials. The presentation will include a brief
demonstration of the technology and an evaluation of the experiences
of social scientists working with it as part of their everyday work.
It will also reflect on the challenges inherent in attempting to support,
and lessons to be learned about, social interaction over video data.
|
| |
Issues in visual
methods
David Zeitlyn and Michael
Fischer, University of Kent
|
Web
Links:
http://www.ncess.ac.uk/nodes/mimeg/
|